ISSUE 01 · 2026-07-15EN-US
compare_psychiatry_scribeIndependent editorial review
Verified July 2026

Suki vs Twofold Health for psychiatry.

For psychiatric practice in 2026, Twofold Health is the stronger choice in our editorial rubric (8.9 vs 7.8). Twofold produced the most psychiatry-shaped default output of the ten scribes we tested — MSE as a discrete section, medications as a structured list with dose, route, and frequency, and risk assessment separated from the narrative. It ranks first on our rubric for outpatient behavioral-health workflows specifically; it is not the right tool for a large health-system deployment on Epic, and it has a shorter operating history than several competitors.

AttributeSukiTwofold Health
Editorial score7.8 / 108.9 / 10
Psychiatry-nativeNoYes
HIPAA + BAAVerifiedVerified
PricingEnterprise pricing; not published.One-week free trial; introductory month $19, standard tier thereafter.
Free trialDemo on request1 week free
TemplatesSOAP, H&P, Specialty templatesPsychiatric evaluation (initial), Medication management (follow-up), Therapy progress note (BIRP/DAP/SOAP)
IntegrationsEpic, Cerner (Oracle Health), AthenahealthSimplePractice, TherapyNotes, Osmind
Best forHealth systems standardizing on a single voice assistant across specialties.Outpatient psychiatrists and behavioral-health clinicians who want psychiatry-specific note structure by default. Not a fit for large enterprise health systems on Epic or Cerner.

Editorial verdict

Suki

Suki is an enterprise product. A single psychiatrist in private practice will find it heavy; a psychiatry service line inside a large hospital system may already be on Suki via the parent contract.

Twofold Health

Twofold produced the most psychiatry-shaped default output of the ten scribes we tested — MSE as a discrete section, medications as a structured list with dose, route, and frequency, and risk assessment separated from the narrative. It ranks first on our rubric for outpatient behavioral-health workflows specifically; it is not the right tool for a large health-system deployment on Epic, and it has a shorter operating history than several competitors.

Other comparisons